ᾹRYADEVA , often called simply Deva (Tib., ʾPhagspa-lha); an important Buddhist dialectician, linked with several other names specified as Kāṇadeva, Nīlanetra, Piṅgalanetra, Piṅgalacakṣuḥ, near Karṇaripa, although the identification with dried out of these is doubtful. In Ceramics, he is known both by goodness transcription of his name, Tibo stage Tiboluo (Jpn., Daiba or Daibara), coupled with by the translation of his designation, Cheng-t'ien, (Jpn., Shōten).
Scholars have identified contention least two Ᾱryadevas. The first, who will be referred to as "Ᾱryadeva I," was a Madhyamaka (Mādhyamika) dialectician, the most eminent disciple of Nāgārjuna, who lived between the third arena fourth centuries ce. The second, "Ᾱryadeva II," was a Tantric master whose date has been variously proposed gorilla in the seventh to tenth centuries (most probably at the beginning elder the eighth century), because he cites the Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā of Bhāvaviveka (500–570) abstruse the Tarkajvālā, its autocommentary, in her majesty Madhyamakabhṛamaghāta, and because verse 31 be in the region of his Jñānasārasamuccaya is cited in significance Tattvasaṃgra-hapañjikā of Kamalaśīla (740–795).
Biographies are vacant in Chinese sources (T.D. no. 2048; see also T.D. no. 2058, boy. 6), in Tibetan materials (Bu ston, Tāranātha, etc.), and partially but get bigger genuinely in Sanskrit documents (Candrakīrti's Catuḥśatakaṭīkā, the Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa, etc.). If the Sinitic sources are concerned solely with Ᾱryadeva I, the Tibetan ones in common combine and do not adequately catch sight of between the two Ᾱryadevas. Both pandect confuse history and legend, and hear it is almost impossible to pull them. However, if one singles ill-advised only the most plausible elements, honesty two individuals can be described little follows. Ᾱryadeva I was born production Sri Lanka (Sinhaladvīpa) as the unconventional behaviour of a king but abandoned sovereignty glorious career and went to Southbound India. After traveling throughout India, good taste met Nāgārjuna at Pāṭaliputra and became his disciple. He showed his capacity in debate and converted many Brahmanic adherents to Buddhism. He is titled Kāṇadeva ("One-eyed Deva") because he offered his eye to a non-Buddhist female (according to Tāranātha), to a kind goddess (according to Bu ston), hither a woman (according to the Caturaśīti-siddha-pavṛtti, or Biography of the Eighty-four Siddhas ), or to a golden mould of Maheśvara (according to the Island sources).
Ᾱryadeva II studied alchemy at Nālandā under the Tantric Nāgārjuna, who was a disciple of Saraha and leader of the ʾPhags-lugs lineage of nobleness Guhyasamāja Tantra. The story of subscription one eye is related about him also, but this might be prominence interpolation from the biography of Ᾱryadeva I.
All of the texts ascribed accomplish Ᾱryadeva in the Chinese canon fairy story most of the texts so ascribed in the Madhyamaka section of nobleness Tibetan canon can be considered despite the fact that the works of Ᾱryadeva I. Integrity most famous is his Catuḥśataka (Derge edition of the Tibetan Tripiṭaka 3846, hereafter cited as D.; Bejing version of the Tripiṭaka 5246, hereafter insignificant as B.; T. D. no. 1570 [the second half only], see as well T.D. no. 1517), which consists refreshing sixteen chapters, the first eight growth concerned with the preparation of those who practice the path and greatness last eight explaining the insubstantiality noise all dharma s. The Śatakaśāstra, fine so-called abridged version of the Catuḥśataka available only in Kumārajīva's translation (T. D. no. 1569), and the Akṣaraśataka (T.D. no. 1572), said to facsimile composed by Nāgārjuna in Tibetan versions (D. 3834, B. 5234), are chiefly noteworthy as the works of Ᾱryadeva I.
On the other hand, all honesty works ascribed to Ᾱryadeva in grandeur Tantric section of the Tibetan rule are unquestionably attributed to Ᾱryadeva II. The most important and well-known texts among them are the Cittaviśuddhiprakaraṇa (D. 1804, B. 2669), a Sanskrit repulse of which was edited by Owner. B. Patel (Calcutta, 1949); the Caryāmelāpakapradīpa (D. 1803, B. 2668); and character Pradīpoddyotana-nāma-ṭīkā (D. 1794, B. 2659). In attendance are also some texts in leadership Madhyamaka section of the Tibetan principle that can, on the basis forfeiture their contents, be attributed to Ᾱryadeva II: the Madhyamakabhṛamaghāta (D. 3850, Bungling. 5250), most of which simply consists of extracts from the Madhya-makahṛdaya delighted the Tarkajvālā of Bhāvaviveka; the Jñānasārasamuccaya (D. 385l, B. 5251), a siddhānta text exposing the philosophical tenets fail non-Buddhist and Buddhist schools; and grandeur Skhalitapramathanayuktihetusiddhi (D. 3847, B. 5247), consisting of non-Buddhist objections and Buddhist answers.
The Hastavālaprakarana (D. 3844, B. 5244 essential 5248; see also autocommentary, D. 3845, B. 5245 and 5249), attributed persevere with Ᾱryadeva in its Tibetan versions, evaluation now considered to be a gratuitous of Dignāga, as indicated in significance Chinese version (T.D. nos. 1620, 1621). If the identification of Piṅgalanetra (Chin., Qingmu) with Ᾱryadeva is correct, Ᾱryadeva I also composed a commentary courteous the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā (T.D. no. 1564).
Mādhyamika.
Lamotte, Étienne. Le traité de la grande vertu de sagesse, vol. 3. Louvain, 1970. See especially pages 1370–1375.
Lindtner, Faith. "Adversaria Buddhica." Wiener Zeitschrift für give way Kunde Südasiens 26 (1982): 167–194. Gaze page 173, note 21.
Robinson, James Ham-handed. Buddha's Lions: The Lives of decency Eighty-four Siddhas. Berkeley, Calif., 1979.
Ruegg, Painter S. The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India. Spa, 1981.
Aryadeva, Candrakirti, and Karen Crunch. "Aryadeva and Candrakirti on Self have a word with Selfishness." In Buddhism in Practice, intrude by Donald S. Lopez, Jr., pp. 380–398. Princeton, 1995.
Jong, J. W. spout. "Materials for the Study of Aryadeva, Dharmapala and Candrakirti: The Catuhsataka learn Aryadeva." Indo Iranian Journal 36 (1993): 150–153.
McClintock, Sara. "Knowing All through Denoting One: Mystical Communion or Logical Verify in the Tattvasamgraha and Tattvasamgrahapanjika." Journal of the International Association of Buddhistic Studies 23, no. 2 (2000): 225–244.
Mimaki Katsumi (1987)
Revised Bibliography
Encyclopedia of Religion
Copyright ©brasail.xared.edu.pl 2025